View source for ConRunner:Dispute resolution

ConRunner is a community, which means that we have to work together in building the reference. Articles often have more than one user working on them, and sometimes users will disagree about how the article should be written. If you have a disagreement over an article, try to reach a truce and stop editing until you can resolve the issue. Please do not engage in edit wars with other users; this is not a helpful way of resolving disputes and does nothing to improve ConRunner. Instead, follow the process outlined here to resolve disagreements and prevent them from turning into serious disputes.

=== In detail ===
If you would like assistance with the process, consult with a neutral third party, agreeable to both parties, to discuss the relevant issues.  The [[Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates]] (AMA) is a group of Wikipedia users who have offered to help to resolve disputes or to understand the process of resolving disputes. You may request assistance from an advocate at any stage of the process of resolving disputes or even when the dispute has just begun.  Earlier is typically better.

'''Note:''' These steps are designed for resolving disagreements between two or more parties. Vandalism and harassment by repeat offenders may be handled using expedited procedures, potentially resulting in the offender being banned from ConRunner. In most situations, however, alleged misconduct by an individual user should be handled using the principles outlined here. This does not mean that users who point out the misconduct are part of the dispute; they simply represent the ConRunner community generally.

== Avoidance ==
''The best way to resolve a dispute is to avoid it in the first place.'' 

Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: '''Do not simply revert changes in a dispute.'''
When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, ''improve'' the edit, rather than reverting it. Provide a good edit summary when making significant changes that other users might object to.  If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond in kind, and do not make personal attacks. 

Writing according to the "[[Wikipedia:the perfect article]]" and following the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] policy can help you write "defensively", and limit your own bias in your writing. For some guidelines, see [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette]].

It is important to note however that ConRunner is somewhat more tolerant of divergent points of view being expressed in a given article.  The emphasis should be on clearly and fairly expressing whatever benefits and detriments a given point of view or approach may have.

== First resort: talk to the other parties involved ==
The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue on a talk page. Either contact the other party on that user's talk page, or use the talk page associated with the article in question. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself. When discussing an issue, stay cool and don't mount personal attacks. Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise. Assume that the other person is acting in good faith unless you have clear evidence to the contrary. 

Both at this stage and throughout the dispute resolution process, talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it. This will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious [[Wikipedia:negotiation]] between the parties, even if not immediately successful, shows that you are interested in finding a solution that fits within ConRunner policies. For additional ideas, see [[Wikipedia:Negotiation]].

== Further dispute resolution ==
If talking to the other parties involved fails, you should try one of these four methods to resolve the dispute. Which ones you choose and in what order will depend on the nature of the dispute, and the preferences of people involved.

=== Discuss with third parties ===
* ConRunner works when we have consensus and respect for differences. To develop a consensus on a disputed topic, you may need to expose the issue to a larger audience.  Options for doing this include posting a message at the Community Portal, and placing a message on the [[Requests for comment]] page. 

For disputes over the content of an article, if you have not agreed to a truce before this point, you should do so now. This allows others to fairly consider the issue without the confusion of ongoing edits, which are likely to aggravate the dispute. If an edit war persists and a truce is not feasible, [[request that the page be protected]] to allow the process to move forward.

<!----
=== Conduct a survey ===
*If consensus is difficult to gauge from discussion alone, or if some users seem to be ignoring the consensus, consider conducting a publicized [[statistical survey|opinion survey]]. Use the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Survey guidelines]] to develop the survey. (Some parties may dispute the validity of the survey if this is not done properly.) The survey should be carefully designed to present all sides of the dispute fairly. When the survey questions have been drafted, announce the survey by listing it at [[Current surveys]]. Note that informal [[straw poll]]s can be held at any time if there are enough participants in the discussion, but publicizing the survey can get more of the community involved and increase the weight given to the results.

See [[Wikipedia:Current surveys]]
--->

=== Mediation ===
* Request mediation of the dispute. [[Wikipedia:Mediation]] is a voluntary process in which a neutral person works with the parties to a dispute. The mediator helps guide the parties into reaching an agreement that can be acceptable to everyone. When requesting formal mediation, be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute using the steps listed above.

See [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation]]

===Requesting an advocate===
* While you can request the assistance of an advocate at any stage please seriously consider use of a member advocate in the later states of dispute resolution. Typically, advocates advise and/or represent one party to a dispute. If you want the services of an advocate, you may contact any advocate directly, or post a [[Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance]]. You can request an advocate at any stage of the process. There is no guarantee the AMA mediators will take on a situataion at ConRunner.

See [[Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates]].

== Last resort: Arbitration==
If you have taken all other reasonable steps to resolve the dispute, request Arbitration. Be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute by other means. Arbitration differs from Mediation in that the Arbitration Committee will consider the case and issue a decision, instead of merely assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. If the issue is decided by Arbitration, you will be expected to abide by the result. If the case involves serious user misconduct, Arbitration may result in a number of serious consequences

[[Category:ConRunner dispute resolution|{{PAGENAME}}]]