Difference between revisions of "Talk:Art Show - Policies"
Bill Taylor (Talk | contribs) |
Bill Taylor (Talk | contribs) (footnotes) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Bruce - yes I see it, and I'm at a loss. The code looks right, but obviously it isn't working. I'm going to have to reasearch this. --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 08:21, 17 Oct 2005 (PDT) | Bruce - yes I see it, and I'm at a loss. The code looks right, but obviously it isn't working. I'm going to have to reasearch this. --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 08:21, 17 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bruce - follow up on the footnote problem. As you see, it only partially works. The answer is that it is a real bug in the wiki code (I found the Bugzilla nuber and ran it down). There is a fix for it, but we aren't running that version here. So the site needs an update to the next version of WikiMedia. I'll ask the ISP about it. My fear is it might break something else. But better now than later, I suppose. --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 10:03, 22 Oct 2005 (PDT) |
Revision as of 10:03, 22 October 2005
Bill - footnote problem
This may have some bearing on the footnote links not working. There are three footnotes in this article. For footnotes two and three, the text body has the correct footnote number, but the footnote itself is still numbered 1.
Bruce - yes I see it, and I'm at a loss. The code looks right, but obviously it isn't working. I'm going to have to reasearch this. --Bill Taylor 08:21, 17 Oct 2005 (PDT)
Bruce - follow up on the footnote problem. As you see, it only partially works. The answer is that it is a real bug in the wiki code (I found the Bugzilla nuber and ran it down). There is a fix for it, but we aren't running that version here. So the site needs an update to the next version of WikiMedia. I'll ask the ISP about it. My fear is it might break something else. But better now than later, I suppose. --Bill Taylor 10:03, 22 Oct 2005 (PDT)