Difference between revisions of "User talk:Phi"

From ConRunner
Jump to: navigation, search
(licensing: new section)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
:::The best would be a blanket statement that says anything owned by Arisia is now owned by Conrunner.net. :)  More realisitcally, just a statement that Conrunner has permission to post Arisia's information from its former database [insert name(s) here] using the Conrunner copyright.  I'll figure a way to put it into the Copyrights page. --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 18:47, 30 January 2007 (PST)
 
:::The best would be a blanket statement that says anything owned by Arisia is now owned by Conrunner.net. :)  More realisitcally, just a statement that Conrunner has permission to post Arisia's information from its former database [insert name(s) here] using the Conrunner copyright.  I'll figure a way to put it into the Copyrights page. --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 18:47, 30 January 2007 (PST)
 +
 +
== licensing ==
 +
 +
I just uploaded a couple of floorplan layouts; I measured and drew these floorplans myself.  I see that there are no actual options in the licensing pulldown for file uploads.  I'd be happy to update the licensing once there are some appropriate options there.

Latest revision as of 09:28, 30 October 2011

Right now my project is to import everything useful from http://wiki.techno-fandom.org/ so that site can be deprecated as an information source. I am also migrating large quantities of generally useful information from the Drupal instance at staff.arisia.org (not a public resource, sorry).

Dumb question, but, "what if any, are the copyright concerns?" --Bill Taylor 11:51, 29 January 2007 (PST)
The stuff coming from staff.arisia.org is material I wrote myself and which I am placing in the public domain by importing it here. That applies to much of the material on wiki.techno-fandom.org as well, but not all of it; I believe the other authors considered themselves to be contributing public information on behalf of Arisia and I am acting on Arisia's behalf by moving it here, but this is not made explicit on the source wiki. Some of the other authors are active here, and I can ask them to import the information themselves if that would be preferable. --phi 12:24, 29 January 2007 (PST)
I'm pretty flexible. I just didn't know how open the source material was. I was thinking a release statement would be enough, but I have no idea where to put it. I suppose a warning to the known contributors, than maybe a note in the Arisia article. --Bill Taylor 13:56, 29 January 2007 (PST)
OK, I've spoken to all the original authors except for Carsten Turner who wrote Logistics, and I'll speak to him on Sunday. I have plenty to keep me busy going forward just with material I wrote myself. At some future point I expect Arisia will have a formal vote to authorize wholesale migration of material owned by the organization; do you have any thoughts on the particular wording we should use? --phi 12:29, 30 January 2007 (PST)
The best would be a blanket statement that says anything owned by Arisia is now owned by Conrunner.net. :) More realisitcally, just a statement that Conrunner has permission to post Arisia's information from its former database [insert name(s) here] using the Conrunner copyright. I'll figure a way to put it into the Copyrights page. --Bill Taylor 18:47, 30 January 2007 (PST)

licensing

I just uploaded a couple of floorplan layouts; I measured and drew these floorplans myself. I see that there are no actual options in the licensing pulldown for file uploads. I'd be happy to update the licensing once there are some appropriate options there.