Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sheraton Guildford Hotel"

From ConRunner
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "There's no reason to conform to the pattern of the other hotel pages, but in case it was not obvious the intent of Westin Boston Waterfront and Hyatt Regency Cambridge is...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There's no reason to conform to the pattern of the other hotel pages, but in case it was not obvious the intent of [[Westin Boston Waterfront]] and [[Hyatt Regency Cambridge]] is to contain everything I know about the hotels that is *not* available on their web site, with only enough publicly available information to glue it all together.  [[User:Phi|phi]] 13:41, 20 December 2011 (PST)
 
There's no reason to conform to the pattern of the other hotel pages, but in case it was not obvious the intent of [[Westin Boston Waterfront]] and [[Hyatt Regency Cambridge]] is to contain everything I know about the hotels that is *not* available on their web site, with only enough publicly available information to glue it all together.  [[User:Phi|phi]] 13:41, 20 December 2011 (PST)
 +
 +
* I agree Phi, it would be good to have a consistent presentation.  Do we know enough to make that happen for the new entries? --[[User:Bill Taylor|Bill Taylor]] 07:35, 21 December 2011 (PST)

Revision as of 07:35, 21 December 2011

There's no reason to conform to the pattern of the other hotel pages, but in case it was not obvious the intent of Westin Boston Waterfront and Hyatt Regency Cambridge is to contain everything I know about the hotels that is *not* available on their web site, with only enough publicly available information to glue it all together. phi 13:41, 20 December 2011 (PST)

  • I agree Phi, it would be good to have a consistent presentation. Do we know enough to make that happen for the new entries? --Bill Taylor 07:35, 21 December 2011 (PST)